vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance and Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 are evenly matched - it comes down to what you need
Best for
- GamingEither - too close to call
- Keeping it for yearsEither - too close to call
Head to head
- Performance
- Gaming
- Camera
- Longevity
- Connectivity
- Extras
All specifications
vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
General
Condition
Available. Released 2025, January 03
Available. Released 2025, January 02
Model
V2352GA
24129RT7CC
Performance
CPU
Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
Mediatek Dimensity 8400 Ultra (4 nm)
GPU
Adreno 735
G720 MC7
Display
Resolution
1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density)
1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density)
Camera
Video Resolution
4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS
4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS
Battery and power
Charging Port
80W wired 7.5W reverse wired
90W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 45 min
Connectivity
2G
900 / 1800 / 1900
900 / 1800 / 1900
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G
–
850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100
3G Bands
HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100
4G Bands
1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41
1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66
5G Bands
1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA
1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6
Bluetooth
5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless
6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX, LHDC 5
Infrared Port
Yes
Yes
NFC
Yes
Yes
Network Technology
HSPA, LTE, 5G
HSPA, LTE, 5G
Ports
Headphone Jack
No
No
USB Type
USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
Build and size
Build
Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame
–
Dimensions
6.78 inches, 111.0 cm 2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio)
6.67 inches, 107.4 cm 2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio)
Features
FM Radio
No
No
Questions people ask
Which is better, vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance or Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4?
vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Endurance and Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 are evenly matched - it comes down to what you need. Neither is clearly ahead on any one thing.
Scores are out of 10 against products released in the last two years, worked out from published specs. Prices are averages of what three or more sellers quoted.